Posted by
James Burns on Friday, November 21, 2008 8:52:08 AM
Why is Obama's administration looking like Bill Clinton's? Seems that the change we can believe in is the change we already had. Every one of Barack Obama's appointments for his staff worked in the Clinton administration in some form. Barack Obama said during his campaign that change will come from outside Washington, but all those chosen so far are from inside Washington.
Why is he doing this? Is is because he is so inexperienced and not ready for the job, he needs to hire all of Clinton's croanies to hold his hand? It started during the campaign, but no one caught it. Obama's selection of Joe "the Gaffe" Biden for V.P. should have been a sign. Lets look and see what Obama has done so far.
First for Chief Of Staff, Rham "the Back Stabber" Emanuel. This man is out for number one. He will turn on Obama in the blink of an eye to benefit himself. He was a big news leak during the Clinton administration. This gave him press favorability and the spot light. this is what Rham loves the spot light. He one day wants to be were Obama is, and will step on anyone to get there.
Then we have Eric " Free the Terrorists" Holder. This man was Assistant Attorney General under Janet Reno. At the end of Clinton's administration he freed a group of Puerto Rican terrorists, FALN, and two Weather Underground members from prison. This was done to help Hillary Clinton during her campaign for senate in New York. She neded to get the Puerto Rican vote to win. Holder had sympathy for these people anyway so it was a good thing for all parties involved. None of the FALN members had requested clemonsy, but rather Holder filled out the paper work and advocated for them to President Clinton. Is this a sign? If confirmed will he empty Gitmo at the blink of an eye. This man is a threat to our national security.
Two names have been mentioned for energy secretary, Al " Gorbal Warming" Gore, and Robert " I don't want the wind farm in front of my house" Kennedy.
This link explains everything.
Finally, the icing on the cake, Hilary Clinton may be picked for Secretary of State. I don't know why he would do this. Her foreign policy experiance came as First Lady. Will she actually set our foregin policy or will Bill do it from behind the scenes. We saw how well his policy worked. The Cole, the first World Trade Center attack come to mind. His lame missle strike on Afghanistan was the extent of his reaction to terrorist attacks on our interests. But the biggest problem is Bill needs to then cut his ties with Muslim nations. Since his presidency ended he has been given large sums of money for speaking and donations from countries like Dubai, Yehman, Kuwat etc.
So the King of Change seems to be the King of The Same. So I ask again is this the change we need? Or is it the change we already had?